A study conducted by computer USA Email List  giant Microsoft warns of distractions caused by technology. 20,000 European employees were questioned and particularly point to the constant flow of emails, messages and notifications which undermines concentration. Teams suffering from “Technostress” Some employees claim that the way their employer deployed the technology subsequently prevented them from being more productive, thus becoming more of a distraction than productivity. According to the study, which surveyed employees in 21 European countries, only 11.4% of respondents say technology has made them very productive. One expert even argues that many teams suffer from high levels of “Technostress”

, claiming that “modern workers have an abundance of technology in their hands, but this availability does not necessarily translate into an impact.”One of the main causes of distraction pointed out by the report is the amount of updates and notifications coming from social media, which makes employees less productive as are other tech-related factors. Another damage highlighted by the study, the “constant connectivity”, which propagates the idea that staff can respond to any request at any time. These flexible working arrangements adopted by many companies are often based on the assumption that those who work longer hours are more productive. Corporate culture, a remedy for the lack of productivity One of the cures for distraction, according to the study’s findings, is corporate culture, which can improve employee productivity and help them feel more involved.

Teams Suffering From “Technostress”

It also allows employees to be trained in the use of software and other tools adopted internally, by explaining their usefulness and the reason for their presence in the company. According to the report, in companies that claimed to have a strong corporate culture, 22% of employees said they felt very productive. In these companies, the technology would also have reduced the employee disengagement rate by 8%. Conversely, around 20% of employees feel disengaged in companies that mismanage technology. Sir Cary Cooper, professor of organizational psychology at Manchester Business School said, “This is one of the unintended consequences of deploying technology. We don’t want to do without it because it’s very good for communications, but we haven’t developed good guidelines for productive use


According to him, the notion of “Technostress” is now part of management science, thus designating the harmful consequences of the adoption of new computer systems or software. Before adding that “technologies can overload people and make them less productive because they find themselves trapped, and do not use them only as part of a service or a product”. Email, a damaging problem for some businesses Sir Cary also said that email had been named as “the second most damaging issue” for large business members of the UK National Forum for Health and Welfare at Work, which he helped coordinate. Recognizing this, some companies have limited their shipments to ease the burden on their employees. According to him “productivity comes from creative exchanges, not from people sending emails sitting in front of machines”.

Corporate Culture, A Remedy For

to accept humor: Example : Mdr you’re a motherfucker -> not hateful according to the user. Show us your butt > deleted if the user is a girl, kept if the user is an adult male. Bodyguard also protects against remarks to loved ones, and all of these steps are completed in 5 milliseconds on average. This allows us to also protect the YouTube Live Chat with the same technology. The user has of course the possibility of restoring a comment (or unblocking a Twittos) which has been deleted. But generally, if Bodyguard made a mistake we restore it ourselves, then we teach the AI ​​not to make that mistake again. Thus, the user has nothing to do: we take care of everything! Obviously, it also happens that Bodyguard goes through some comments

this is not a problem because we also have tools allowing us to manually check certain “at risk” comments that we manually delete if they turn out to be hateful. . We are once again teaching Bodyguard to detect these kinds of comments so as not to let them go. It is through these devices that we can assure our users that we are 100% safe from hateful comments. Why do you think you can do better than the platforms themselves and their moderation system? First of all, there is no platform that offers an intelligent moderation system in French. YouTube, Instagram and Twitch have launched a similar service in English (1 year ago), still in Beta, so before it arrives in French it can take years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.